Modern Russian Military Technology - Kamov KA-52 Flight. Video
New Russian attack helicopter Ka-52 constructed in engineering bureau named after Kamov. It posesses following technical characteristics: * Crew: Two * Length: 13.50 m * Rotor diameter: 2x 14.50 m * Empty weight: 7,800 kg * Loaded weight: 10400 kg * Max takeoff weight: 10,800 kg * Powerplant: 2× Klimov TV3-117VK turboshafts, 1,660 kW (2,226 shp) each * For Ka-52: * Maximum speed: 390 km/h in dive * Cruise speed: 270 km/h * Range: 1,160 km * Service ceiling: 5,500 m (18,000 ft) Armament: * 1x mobile semi-rigid 30 mm Shipunov 2A42 cannon (240 rounds, dual feeding AP or HE-Frag) * A variety of payloads on the four under-wing hardpoints, including 23 mm UPK-23-250 gun pods (240 rounds each), APU-6 9K121 Vikhr anti-tank missile racks, Vympel R-73 (NATO: AA-11 Archer) air-to-air missiles, 80 mm S-8 rocket and 122 mm S-13 rocket pods, Kh-25 semi-active laser guided tactical air-to-ground missiles, presumably S-25/S-25L high caliber rockets, 4x 250 kg bombs or 2x 500 kg bombs, 500 L external fuel tanks. Reportedly, twin Igla light air-to-air missile launchers under each wingtip countermeasure pod (total 4 missiles). Maximum total payload 2,000 kg. * Two pods on the wingtips with flare and chaff countermeasure dispensers, 64 cartridges each (total 128).
Comments on "Modern Russian Military Technology - Kamov KA-52 Flight."
Chechen rebels did ... Chechen rebels did see this monster attacking them, they were hiding up in the high mountains once where no tail rotor helicopter could go, and thought they were? safe, until they were attacked by a Kamov
Aye good point,? ... Aye good point,? let say that Humans are stupid because they create things like that.
Look pal, I dunno ... Look pal, I dunno if your head is in the sand, or up your arse, but you haven't a clue about your own military history. Have alook on google. There'll be a few wanting to mention it. Mention LeMay and McArthur. But theres a few more who wanted it.
Kennedy had all sorts of problems keeping the nuke 'em hawks in line.
But - you're? as bad as a muslim revisionist, or an american-irish catholic - ignore truth because its inconvenient.
We don't want to ... We don't want to nuke them. Where did that come from, cold war propaganda or something? We wish our ancestors didn't use our nukes, but I guess it was best for us, because we would have gained more casualties. McArthur was a crazy man who profited off of fear. Are you going to tell me that the reds have NEVER had such a crazy man in your civilization? Do you forget how your people would kill jews? for lulz? No one is great, We threatened China but reds threatened us. Fear is key.
Are you trying to ... Are you trying to say that the yanks WOULDN'T have used nukes if the Russians hadn't armed their adversaries ? For f**ks sake, there have been several yank generals WANTED to use nukes against? Koreans, Vietnamese and even China for God's sake. Starting with that nutcase McArthur, Curtis LeMay - etc etc etc
That isn't really ... That isn't really fair to say, because the United States' society is a mix of just about all races and cultures. Saying it was just made of German tech is kind of like saying that the first British tank was created by the Spanish. All races are created by man. We all come from one man, and one woman. The difference is? just many adaptions. All Russians, Europeans, Americans, Asians and Africans are all humans traced back to two humans. It matters who pulls any trigger. A gun is bad too.
So, you're saying ... So, you're saying that classic Korean "I NUKE YOU BECRUS I CAHN" attitude wouldn't have been obtained if the reds didn't arm them for a civil war? Because ever since, they sure are trying to look feisty. And to my man, Kim Jong IL, Good night sweet prince! And yes, we blamed you for their attitude, but i'm sure when someone nukes someone? else, that nuclear deterrence would kill us all. Cheers my friend, because we're all gonna die! Great job stealing our nuke idea, it worked so well!
They have every ... They have every reason to get angry about American double standards - note that even? the Americans never try to accuse Russia for arming muslim extremists like THEY did ?
haha, the f**k is ... haha, the f**k is it. Without German tech the US only got airplanes? and some Guns but not the heavy ones. Check out what the M1 do without German tech. And ohh I forget the Nuke Bombs are German tech too. Pull the Tiger first? Only for Nuclear war. History show you what happens when you pull the trigger first.
Son, I didn't call ... Son, I didn't call you a red, put that small little Asian cock into your pants, we ain't talking to you.
It doesn't matter who has the better weapon, it matters who will pull the trigger first. That's why nuclear war is a close to no? chance of happening in this century.
Sorry, just a ... Sorry, just a guess? because most Russians get butthurt.
ahw talk about you? ... ahw talk about you? Really that will say where I came from?? But ok I will tell you when you can find the city where this guy was born: Boris Becker. This is the same City I was born and so you know where I am from.
And for the AH64 LB, most of the infantry carry gun 12,7mm heavy MG can do damage to this Chopper. And that is only a infantry gun, when the LB is under attack from a ZU-23-2 he will be dead soon but most of them are to far away for the range of a ZU-23-2
Red ??? Me ?? ... Red ??? Me ?? Nothing could be further from the truth
Just a? realist.
Cool 2 comments bro ... Cool 2 comments bro. Anyhow, let me get this straight, you reds can arm the Vietnamese and? the Koreans, but if we dare try to play your game with the Afgans, we are doing the wrong thing? Yep, perfect argument. I see why your government(s) haven't lasted longer than 1 third of ours since the 1900s. Too tough? It's ok.
Stereotypical names are passed around all over with different meanings. Some people call Russians AND Germans reds. We call brits yanks, others dont. We arent all alike.
The Americans were ... The Americans were arming fanatical muslim extremists with the latest weapons, and even had advisors in Afghanistan doing it.
THATS why the Russians got out (Hardly "ran away"") The Russians AREN'T? arming the Taliban. Thats the difference.
Then the weapons and money yanks gave the Afghani extremists (who were mainly Arab and Pakistani as now) were turned on other countries, and the money went to pay for attacks on American targets.
But thats the Yanks for you
The term "yank" ... The term "yank" began when the original Dutch of New? Amsterdam invented their own version of the British "John Bull" and called him "Jan Kies" the British therefore called them all "Jan Kies" = "Yankees" - hardly insulting.
And since when have the Brits been called "Yanks" ? Limeys, Poms, and various others, few complimentary. But thats nicknames for you.
And friendly fire does happen often. More often with American forces than others .
And many of the US pilots ARE showboaters.
Hahaha, hows that ... Hahaha, hows that soviet union doing? Sounds like your political spectrum? of rainbows always hits the thunderstorm.
Hahaha, you call us ... Hahaha, you call us Yanks, and we call Brits Yanks...Funny. Any how, we are each brought up through propaganda. You have been told that friendly fire happens often. That is not true. In fact, that is very rare, excluding Vietnam. The average friendly fire kill rate is roughly 2%. If you are going to tell me your army doesn't do the same, you are a liar. You are also told that "showboating pricks" are most of our pilots. That is not true. In fact, most pilots are very? professional.
If you are willing ... If you are willing to talk about me,? at least feel free to reply to me too, it really says something about where you come from...
AH64 was made from ... AH64 was made from the 70s, but they keep? updating it
The yanks aren't ... The yanks aren't stupid. They have their own version and have equipment to deal with the S300 too? (great as it is)
If the US tries to ... If the US tries to be clever with the Russkis, they'd get a nasty surprise. Its one thing taking on? a bunch of Pakis and Arabs in Afghanistan (and even a few Afghans !), quite another taking on Russians. While American hardware is great, it also requires ridiculous backup, and has far too many showboating pricks piloting them - evidence is the disgusting amount of friendly fire deaths from the Yanks.
Absolutely ,- ... Absolutely ,- thumbs? up from this Brit
@Talshet , @ ... @Talshet , @Jerimiah10 that is what US fanboys do all the time they think they are so good because they fight against a opponent who got stuff that is 10-30 years older than their own US stuff. You think you are awesome because they can shoot down with their jets? a other who got no radar and you wonder why you win that? but look at your f4 how the f**kt up in Vietnam against the simple MIG. The Ah64 LB is a HGAC and no anti air... the KA 52 is able do handle both things.
Wild Afghanistan ... Wild Afghanistan appears!
Russians run away.
got away safely.
united states uses operation enduring freedom!
united states? attempts to catch Afghanistan
*click* Afghanistan was caught.
*Warning*-Afghanistan is a wild country and will not respond to most commands unless forced to.
Russians use S-300. ... Russians use S-300.
C-130? lose.
Maybe you have no ... Maybe you have no idea when the AH64 was build. And the KA50 and KA52 are only heavy ground attack helicopter not Air and ground defense helicopters like AH64 or Mi-28. And the armor of AH64 is just average like the Mi-24.The russian took the armor from the Su-25 for the KA-50 and KA-52, the armor of Su-25 is best armored jet this is confirmed? by all countries.It can hold 40mm explosive shells and 80mm rpg rounds. AH64 can hold 23mm.Mi-28 can hold 23mm till 30mm litle more than AH64
KA-50/KA-52!!!
... KA-50/KA-52!!!
Because Nightmares counts in quantity of rotors.?
the? best ... the? best helicopter number 01 and the ka 50
Kinda, It was a ... Kinda, It was a while ago, I? honestly couldn't remember.
